Nox-Lumen MfgNox-Lumen Mfg

Case study: AI drawing review

Background: Describes a concrete international façade/window subcontractor rollout. Processes differ per customer; replicate only via the phased services model on the hub page.

One-liner positioning

Machine triage + engineer adjudication. Liberate specialists from brute-force cross-checking dimensions, quantities, glass packs, hardware, etc.—while keeping humans on the hook for reds. Customer idioms accumulate as reusable policy assets.

The assistant never replaces engineer stamps—it asks questions, it does not invent specification values.

Flow

Sales uploads CAD PDF + door/window schedule xlsx + spec docx (optional photo)
Platform classifies • parses • extracts openings with provenance + confidence scores
Cross-view reconciliation • mandatory checklist • regulatory & bespoke rules
Review cards • evidence crops • severity buckets
Issues translated into layperson prompts → Feishu / WeCom / DingTalk queues
Sales chases answers → replies captured inline
Automated rework until reds vanish → engineer signs
Structured manifest released to quoting module (+ memory updates)
Closed-loop reinforcement of exemptions & lessons learned

Core capabilities

1. Multi-source parsing

Every ingested datum logs source lineage + calibrated confidence. Low-trust captures stay flagged for human confirmation—“no guessing” on garbage scans.

2. Cross-view reconciliation

Field groupToleranceEscalation
Width / height (mm)±10 mm or ±0.5 % (whichever larger)🔴
Countsexact match🔴
Series / profile systemnormalized equality🔴
Glazing / colour / finishnormalized equality🟡
Swing directionstring equality🟡
Node referencesref must exist in attachments🟡
Naming aestheticsadvisory🔵

Every conflict lists all observed values + pointer (cell / drawing region) + highlight crops.

3. Three-layer rule stack

LayerOwnerExample
L1 global must-havesPlatformseries, W×H, qty, glass, swing
L2 regional codesPlatform (region packs)AS 2047 wind, GB 50189 thermal, EN 14351 CE
L3 customer DNAPM-maintained“Customer X mandates LowE+Argon on every pane”

Each rule is inspectable: clause text, trigger, severity, remediation.

4. Severity & hard gates

SeverityMeaningDefaultWho clears
🔴 Criticalnumeric mismatch / code breachBlocks downstream quote & plantEngineer
🟡 Importantmissing / inconsistent finish familyBlock unless waiver w/ rationaleLead sales or engineer
🔵 Informationalnaming polishLog only

Invariant: no job advances with open reds.

5. Clarification composer

Turns technical deltas into sales-friendly bullet prompts with thumbnail evidence. Only questions—no recommended values so reps don’t rubber-stamp dangerous defaults.

6. Approval routing

Escalation patterns combine severity + account tier (customizable). Fire / wind / thermal exposures may require technical director co-sign.

7. Memory & continuous improvement

Auto-ingest waivers, customer habits, false-positive trends. Monthly governance packs highlight rule fatigue or over-tightening.

Comparison vs status quo

LensAs-isGeneric PDF AICAD-only suitesThis stack
RampSenior mentoringDIY glueForced CAD adoptionShort training
Cycle timeManual sheet-by-sheetPartialFormat-lockedMachine triage + human reds only
Multi-viewHuman eyeWeakSometimesAutomated w/ evidence
Mandatory fieldsTribalNoneTemplate-onlyL1+L2+L3 stack
Customer memoryMentalNoneNoneAuto reuse
CodesScatteredNonePartial librariesModular AS/GB/EN
Quoting bridgeManualNoneSome ERP hopsStrong contract handshake
Data custodyOwnedMixedSaaS hybridsDedicated tenant fences
Replacing stampsrisky CAD vendorsambiguousNever

Promises captured in contract language

Explained evidence, waive-with-reason tooling, sovereign storage, analytics never leak across tenants, deterministic audit logs.

Not in MVP (by design)

TopicReasonRevisit when
Native DWG/Revit importMVP uses PDF/tabular payloadsDemand ≥ 10 mandates
Autonomous redraw / field stuffingLiabilityExcluded indefinitely
Structural / drainage / thermal calcsLicensed engineer realmExcluded indefinitely

Rollout pacing (indicative)

PhaseWeeksHighlightsAcceptance
P0 sample lab~2Baseline parsers on golden projectsGo / no-go report
P1 parsing + reco~3Parsing + reco enginesRecall metrics
P2 gates + QA UX~3Severity + chatter + dashboardsSales E2E
P3 quote coupling~1Contracts w/ quotingFixture sign-off
P4 reinforcement~2Memory autopilot30-case burn-in

~9–11 weeks end-to-end. After P2 (~5–6 wks) sales can consume day-to-day.

Contact info@nox-lumen.com for annexes covering detailed SOW and SLAs.

On this page